Yes, I think I’ve probably mentioned it on a few different occasions, but here’s the mention from my essay on the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, “We Remember”:
When Democrat Lyndon Johnson was the Senate Majority Leader and Republican Dwight Eisenhower was President of the United States, LBJ — one of the most intense, passionate political animals in our history — never attacked President Eisenhower. It wasn’t because LBJ agreed with Eisenhower’s policies. It wasn’t because LBJ was scared. It was because, as LBJ explained in 1953 in a comment that has an unfortunately haunting connection to 9/11, “If you’re in an airplane, and you’re flying somewhere, you don’t run up to the cockpit and attack the pilot. Mr. Eisenhower is the only President we’ve got.”
LBJ revisited the idea behind those comments during Richard Nixon’s Presidency, as well, but with somewhat different language. Johnson said that Nixon was a son of a bitch, “But he’s the only son of a bitch President that we’ve got.”
Eisenhower 1956: The President’s Year of Crisis: Suez and the Brink of War
David A. Nichols
Paperback. 346 pp.
February 2012. Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
A few years ago, I ordered the The Presidents Collection DVD box set from PBS’s awesome American Experience series. This particular set included documentaries about 10 of the most important and influential Presidents of the 20th Century: Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman, John F. Kennedy (in “The Kennedys” featuring the story of the entire political family), Lyndon B. Johnson, Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, and George H.W. Bush. For someone like me, 35 hours worth of documentaries about our Presidents is basically my personal definition of heaven and I have never had any complaints about my purchase. However, I’ve always been surprised that one of the 20th Century Presidents left out of this particular set of DVDs is the 34th President, Dwight D. Eisenhower.
For some reason, Dwight D. Eisenhower as President is often overlooked or overshadowed. The mid-20th Century featured large personalities immediately preceding and succeeding Eisenhower in the Presidency — FDR, Truman, JFK, LBJ, and Nixon — and the eight years that Eisenhower served were relatively calm, peaceful, and prosperous in comparison to the events that took place during the Administrations of FDR (Great Depression/World War II), Truman (End of World War II/Atomic bombing of Japan/Korean War), JFK (Bay of Pigs/Cuban Missile Crisis), LBJ (Civil Rights Movement/Vietnam), and Nixon (Vietnam/Watergate). Then there’s the fact that Eisenhower’s greatest fame came before he entered the world of politics, first as one of the leading Generals and then the Supreme Allied Commander in World War II, where he planned and oversaw the successful D-Day invasion of Europe. In a way, President Eisenhower has always been overshadowed by General Eisenhower, and Eisenhower’s performance as President continues to be underrated, although more Americans are beginning to understand Ike’s greatness during his two terms in the White House.
The world didn’t stop being a dangerous place from 1953-1961. A famous Eisenhower quote inscribed on a wall at the Eisenhower Museum in Abilene, Kansas notes that the peace and prosperity that the United States enjoyed during his Administration wasn’t the result of good luck: “The United States never lost a soldier or a foot of ground during my Administration. We kept the peace. People ask how it happened — by God, it didn’t just happen.” Eisenhower spent almost his entire adult life prior to entering politics as a warrior, but as President, the old soldier committed himself and his nation towards, in one of his favorite phrases, “waging peace”.
Even before Dwight D. Eisenhower was sworn into office in January 1953, he took steps to end the fighting in the Korean War, which had become a stalemate under President Truman. During the transition between Eisenhower’s election and inauguration, the President-elect followed through on a campaign pledge and traveled to Korea to revive peace talks and help guide the parties to an Armistice. When he took office, Eisenhower hit the ground running and Americans had immense faith in their new President because of the leadership skills that helped the Allies win World War II. The peace and prosperity that Americans enjoyed during Eisenhower’s first term virtually guaranteed that Ike could be easily re-elected in 1956.
David A. Nichols begins his remarkable look at the most difficult year of Dwight D. Eisenhower’s Presidency, Eisenhower 1956: The President’s Year of Crisis: Suez and the Brink of War (Paperback, 2012, Simon & Schuster), with President Eisenhower enjoying a nice vacation at the Colorado home of his mother-in-law. However, early in the morning of September 24, 1955, the President, who was less than a month away from his 65th birthday, suffered a massive heart attack. The quick reaction of Eisenhower’s wife, Mamie, may have saved the President’s life, but a little over a year away from the 1956 election, Eisenhower’s ability to seek re-election, or even continue in the Presidency, was in serious question.
Nichols follows President Eisenhower’s recovery into 1956 as Ike slowly but surely regains his strength and becomes convinced that he is not only capable of seeking re-election, but that his country needs him to remain at the helm. The President’s heart attack is the beginning of several crises that make Eisenhower 1956 a gripping account as the political calendar flips closer and closer to Election Day, and as one international crisis after another plunge the world to the brink of yet another World War and seemingly blend together to make every move that the Eisenhower Administration makes potentially dangerous and crucial to the survival of peace.
In Eisenhower 1956, David A. Nichols uncovers incredible details from recently declassified documents, personal diaries, diplomatic cables, and more in order to prove that Dwight D. Eisenhower was not merely a popular, genial, caretaker in the White House. Instead, Eisenhower was a hands-on leader who may have come from a military background but who had perhaps better political instincts than any American politician of his time. Eisenhower was clever and cunning, in national politics and international diplomacy. Despite running for a second term and another serious setback to his health, Eisenhower stays engaged at a top-level and, in many instances, the President’s perspective on foreign relations and his vision for the big picture rivals that of his ever-present Secretary of State John Foster Dulles and any of the other longtime political or diplomatic veterans in Eisenhower’s Cabinet or inner circle. For those readers who were previously aware of Eisenhower’s surprising political skills, Eisenhower 1956 will add to your appreciation of Ike’s capabilities. For those who might have thought of the old General as a hands-off delegator with a famous smile who won the Presidency as something akin to a lifetime achievement award — and there are many Americans who have thought of Eisenhower the President in that way over the past half-century — this book by Nichols is perhaps the best revelation yet about Eisenhower’s immense skills and how he transformed the Presidency.
The main conflict in Eisenhower 1956 is the Suez Crisis, an event that continues to have consequences today in an area of the world which remains a flashpoint. Since the Suez Crisis took place in 1956, some historians have looked at it one of the last gasps of European colonialism in the wake of World War II. Throughout Eisenhower 1956, the deep research done by David A. Nichols reveals incredible details about how the Suez Crisis escalated and what could have happened if not for the restraint and stunning diplomatic footwork of President Eisenhower and the Eisenhower Administration. One of the most incredible aspects of the Suez Crisis is how, just a decade following the end of World War II, two of America’s wartime Allies that owed perhaps more gratitude than anyone else to Dwight D. Eisenhower — Great Britain and France — secretly plotted with Israel to double-cross President Eisenhower and the United States in order to attack Egypt after Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal. It is a tremendous story, told with incredible detail by Dr. Nichols, which not only takes you back to 1956, but makes you feel as if you were in charge of President Eisenhower’s daily calendar throughout the crisis.
Most unbelievable of all is that President Eisenhower’s bid for re-election, the most heated moments of the Suez Crisis, and Eisenhower’s precarious health are issues that don’t simply share the same year — 1956 — but, in many cases, take place simultaneously. And, as President Eisenhower considers how to handle the Suez Crisis — including the unthinkable possibility of American forces combating the aggression against Egypt by responding militarily against our seemingly inseparable Allies, Britain, France, and Israel — the Soviet Union puts down a popular revolt in Hungary with 200,000 Russian troops and threatens to funnel weapons and funding, if not direct military support, in the Middle East.
Eisenhower 1956 is a compelling, phenomenal history of one of our great, underrated Presidents, at the top of his game as a world leader and visionary of modern global relations, responding to a hurricane of dangerous international crises with political skills that few leaders — Presidents, diplomats, politicians, or soldiers — have ever possessed. Dr. Nichols has crafted a masterpiece that does justice to the gravity of the events portrayed in his book while giving President Eisenhower the just due that he so richly deserves. This is an important work for the study of Eisenhower, the American Presidency, the Cold War, and the always-evolving status of American relations in the Middle East.
Eisenhower 1956: The President’s Year of Crisis: Suez and the Brink of War by David A. Nichols is available now in hardcover and paperback from Simon & Schuster. You can order the book from Amazon, or download it instantly for your Kindle. Dr. Nichols previously authored another title about the 34th President, A Matter of Justice: Eisenhower and the Beginning of the Civil Rights Revolution (BOOK•KINDLE). For more information on Dr. Nichols, be sure to check out his author page at the Simon & Schuster website.
"We seek peace, knowing that peace is the climate of freedom. And now, as in no other age, we seek it because we have been warned, by the power of modern weapons, that peace may be the only climate possible for human life itself.” —Dwight D. Eisenhower (1890-1969), 34th President of the United States (1953-1961), Second Inaugural Address, January 21, 1957
Eisenhower was a good President. He was popular with the American people and the nation under Eisenhower experienced relative peace and prosperity. Ike was underrated in his political abilities. Because Eisenhower was plain-spoken, a career soldier, and an older man who was kind of grandfatherly, many people think of him as a political novice. Instead, Eisenhower was a very clever political operator, not just as President but also as he rose through the ranks of the U.S. Army.
In fact, Eisenhower organized the Executive Office of the President in a different manner than it had previously been organized. Eisenhower brought that military-style organization into the White House and the model that he created for governing is pretty closely followed today. Eisenhower was the first President to appoint a White House Chief of Staff. Other Presidents had private secretaries that played a similar role, but Eisenhower (who had been Chief of Staff to several Generals prior to World War II) not only created that position to assist the Commander-in-Chief, but even carried over the name of the Chief of Staff position from the Army to the White House. Since Eisenhower’s Presidency, the influence of the White House Chief of Staff has continued to grow to the point where, in many instances, the Chief of Staff is one of the most powerful people in the United States. Eisenhower’s vision for how the Executive Branch should be organized in order for it to be as efficient as possible was really visionary for someone who happened to be the last President born in the 19th Century.
Now, no President is perfect and that goes for Eisenhower, too. I wish he would have openly opposed Wisconsin Senator Joseph McCarthy during McCarthy’s disgusting witch-hunt that ruined the lives of so many people. I think President Eisenhower could have brought an end to the McCarthy hearings if he had used the power of his office and personality to stand up to McCarthy. We know now that Eisenhower worked in the background to destroy McCarthy, but I feel that what he helped eventually accomplish behind-the-scenes could have happened sooner if Eisenhower — the most popular and trusted person in the United States, if not the world in the 1950s — had used the force of his personality to bring McCarthy down. A lot of innocent people were ruined by McCarthy’s attacks and by Eisenhower’s reluctance to publicly take McCarthy on.
Overall, though, Eisenhower was a good President and good for our country.
Well, Taylor died in office and both he and Grant were political neophytes. Taylor was President in the midst of the sectional crises and died as Congress was working on the Missouri Compromise. Grant dealt with Reconstruction, post-Civil War racial tensions throughout the country, rampant corruption in the U.S. Government, and wasn’t much of a leader when he wasn’t on the battlefield.
Eisenhower, however, was a monumental figure even amongst his fellow Presidents. No one has ever denied his ability to lead, both on-and-off of the battlefield. Eisenhower’s military career required far more political maneuvering than Taylor’s or Grant’s because of the era that he served and the people he served with. Eisenhower had large reserves of the political intuition that both Taylor and Grant sorely lacked.
It was exactly 42 years today that Dwight David Eisenhower died at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, D.C. Eisenhower was 77 years old and had lived the final months of his life in a suite at the famed veteran’s hospital, under constant observation by doctors who were treating the 34th President for congestive heart failure.
With his family at his side, the great General was prepared for death, exhausted and ailing after seven heart attacks throughout his long, legendary life. A military man to the end, Eisenhower’s last words were an order: “I want to go. God take me.” At 12:25 PM on March 28, 1969, the General’s final order was carried out. A few days later, after lying in state in the United States Capitol Rotunda and being honored in a funeral at the National Cathedral, Eisenhower was buried in a simple military casket at his Presidential Library in Abilene, Kansas.
"In preparing for battle I have always found that plans are useless, but planning is indispensable." — Dwight Eisenhower (1890-1969), 34th President of the United States (1953-1961)
"The middle of the road is all of the usable surface. The extremes, right and left, are in the gutters." — Dwight D. Eisenhower (1890-1969), 34th President of the United States (1953-1961)
Truman did not seriously consider running for President in 1952. He barely won the 1948 election, stunning his Republican opponent Thomas Dewey (“Dewey Defeats Truman”). By the time the 1952 election cycle began, Truman was historically unpopular and knew it was time to get out. If he had chosen to, he could have run again — the 22nd Amendment applied to Presidents beginning with Eisenhower.
In 1952, Robert Taft was the front-runner for the Republican nomination until Dwight Eisenhower threw his hat into the ring. Eisenhower’s entry moved the Republicans towards the middle (Taft was very conservative) and destroyed Taft’s chances of ever becoming President (he died of cancer in 1953). When Truman decided not to run, the Democratic Party was basically turned over to Adlai Stevenson who ended up being the Democratic Presidential nominee in 1952 and 1956. Eisenhower beat Stevenson easily both times.
Plus, Eisenhower talked about running for President if only to deny General MacArthur the chance at winning the White House. If it came down to a battle for the Republican nomination between Eisenhower and MacArthur in 1952, I don’t think MacArthur would have stood a chance.