Install this theme
Anonymous
asks:
I apologize if you've already answered something like this, but what is your opinion on the US being a so-called world police? Do you think that it is a good policy to be like that, or that it is harmful? I think that it is bad to close ourselves off to the world, but instead of being an enforcer, who fights, we should be a helper, who aids, so to speak. What do you think?

No, I think it’s terrible for the United States to be the world’s police.  It’s costly for our country, and it alienates countries around the world who resent our intrusion into issues that are really none of our business. 

In some instances where our national security is threatened, we must act.  In some instances where our allies need or seek our help, we should act.  But in too many instances, the United States does feel that it needs to police the world.  Now, I think that there is a movement from all sides of the political spectrum in the U.S. to reduce that role.  And I do think that there’s a fine line because we also don’t want to be isolationists.  I do agree with what you said — instead of enforcing, we should assist, and we should only do so when our assistance is requested or there is a clear and present danger to our national security or our nation’s immediate interests.

 
  1. potsyelooy said: Can you make this reblogable please? Thank you :)
  2. deadpresidents posted this
Blog comments powered by Disqus